Currently, available drugs specifically target the EGFR and elicit high response rates. The cost of these drugs often results in the use of less expensive antiemetics such as droperidol. Describe the procedures for your study in sufficient detail that other scientists could repeat your work to verify your findings.
Department of English Writing Guide. CRNA Forum ;9 2: The most important principle to be remembered on this issue is to obey the criteria of simplicity, clarity, and effectiveness. Be sure to include the hypotheses you tested, controls, treatments, variables measured, how many replicates you had, what you actually measured, what form the data take, etc.
In the current sample, telehealth PE treatment was safe and pragmatically viable. Each paragraph should not contain more than words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly.
Components of Results section Results should answer main hypothesis or research question s Order of presenting results is arbitrary May be done in Table 1 in less-complicated studies; or be set apart to emphasize its importance.
EGFR-overexpressing cancers are highly aggressive and have a higher tendency to metastasize. The previous studies can be an explanation or reinforcement of your findings.
For some studies, age may be an important factor. In one or two sentences, state the main models or strategies that you used to study this specific research question. Most studies yield new discoveries that prompt additional studies. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove.
Evaluating the medical literature Part II: Avoiding the "school paper style" rejection. Which target journal should be selected. What was your overall approach for studying the gap. This section will be greatly expanded in a real Discussion section to place your finding in the context of multiple published studies.
Do they affect the ability to generalize your findings.
For laboratory studies you need not report the date and location of the study UNLESS it is necessary information for someone to have who might wish to repeat your work or use the same facility. It can be seen as a summary of your discussion and tells the reader why your research matters.
This paragraph should be well-rounded, meaning that contrary reports must also be discussed. This will give your conclusions more credence. Expert internal reviewers have a profound knowledge about the subject, and they can provide guidance about the writing process of the manuscript ie.
Of course you did, because that is what all good scientists do, and it is a given that you recorded your measurements and observations.
Your comments and suggestions are valuable. If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding.
In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice makes perfect.
Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction.
While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.
Therefore, during construction of a draft, attention distracting environment should be avoided, and this step should be completed within 1—2 hours.
Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section.
In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics. That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.
The discussion section is a very important part of your dissertation or research paper. It is also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. Yet, many students write it in a rushed manner. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by. Feb 12, · The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: an introductory paragraph, intermediate paragraphs and a conclusion paragraph.
For intermediate paragraphs, a “divide and conquer” approach, meaning a full paragraph describing each of the study endpoints, can be used.
The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics. That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.How to write a discussion section